Preservation as a Service for Trust (PaaST) dalam Penjagaan Keaslian dan Keamanan Arsip Digital

Authors

  • Nurul Habib Romadhan Universitas Indonesia
  • Tamara Adriani Salim Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v5i1.6740

Keywords:

Article, PaaST, Blockchain, Content, Formatting, Digital Preservation, ISO 16363, OAIS, Security

Abstract

Preservation as a Service for Trust (PaaST) is an innovative approach to digital archive preservation that integrates technical, policy, and audit functions into a trust-based managed service model. Given the increasing volume of digital data and the risks of format degradation and cybersecurity, PaaST exists to ensure the authenticity, integrity, and trustworthiness of long-term archives. This study uses a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach to identify trends, practices, and challenges in PaaST implementation from 2019 to 2025. The literature search process was conducted on various academic databases and institutional documents related to digital preservation standards such as OAIS (ISO 14721), ISO 16363 trusted repository certification, and the application of cryptography and blockchain technology for authenticating archives. The review results indicate that the managed digital preservation service model is increasingly being adopted by large archives and libraries because it is considered efficient, secure, and sustainability-oriented. The use of fixity check mechanisms, digital signatures, and timestamping (both blockchain-based and non-blockchain-based) has been proven to improve data integrity and the evidentiary value of archives. However, key challenges remain: financial sustainability, compliance with standards, and limited technical resources in small institutions. This article emphasizes the importance of synergy between technology, institutional policies, and long-term governance in PaaST implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrams. (2023). Abrams, S. (2023). Understanding OAIS and digital repository trustworthiness: A framework for sustainable digital preservation. Journal of Digital Preservation Studies, 9(2), 55 - 72. https://doi.org/10.1080/25730231.2023.109872

Abrams, S. (2023). Understanding OAIS and digital repository trustworthiness: A framework for sustainable digital preservation. Journal of Digital Preservation Studies, 9(2), 55 - 72. https://doi.org/10.1080/25730231.2023.109872

Becker, C., Kulovits, H., & Rauber, A. (2021). Executable archives and software integrity in digital preservation environments. International Journal of Digital Curation, 16(1), 1 - 18. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v16i1.777

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide for researchers. SAGE Publications.

Conway, P., & Hedstrom, M. (2021). Risk management and audit frameworks for trustworthy digital repositories. Information Management Review, 37(4), 287 - 303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imrev.2021.100421

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (EBSE Technical Report). Keele University.

McLeod, J., & Lomas, E. (2023). Record DNA: reconceptualising digital records as the future evidence base. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-023-09414-w

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2020). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. PLoS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583

Moore, R. W. (2018). Digital Archives and Preservation. Dalam Encyclopedia of Database Systems (2nd ed.). Springer.

National Archives. (2025). 16363 reasons to trust: Building reliable digital preservation systems. The National Archives Technical Series. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Pacheco, A., Da Silva, C. G., & De Freitas, M. C. V. (2023). A metadata model for authenticity in digital archival descriptions. Archival Science, 23, 629 - 673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-023-09422-w

Phillips, M., Bailey, J., & Owens, T. (2021). Changing practices in fixity: Integrity and authenticity in digital preservation. D-Lib Magazine, 27(3/4). https://doi.org/10.1045/march2021-phillips

Sharma, A., & Kumar, S. (2022). Digital preservation in digital libraries: A systematic review of sustainability and policy frameworks. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 21(2), 2250018. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649222500189

Stančić, H., & Bralić, V. (2021). Digital Archives Relying on Blockchain: Overcoming the Limitations of Data Immutability. Computers, 10(8), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10080091

Zahara, N. R., & Salim, T. A. (2022). Preservation of Digital Archives: Systematic Literature Review. Record and Library Journal, 8(2), 285 - 297. https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.V8-I2.2022.285-297

Downloads

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Nurul Habib Romadhan, & Salim, T. A. (2026). Preservation as a Service for Trust (PaaST) dalam Penjagaan Keaslian dan Keamanan Arsip Digital. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v5i1.6740

Issue

Section

Articles