Implikasi Filsafat Hukum dalam Melakukan Kebijakan dalam Pembuatan dan Perancangan Kontrak Internasional

Authors

  • Anastasia Zefanya Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v1i4.1213

Keywords:

Philosophy of Law, International Agreements, International Law

Abstract

Countries that enter into international agreements have several tools to increase the strength and credibility of their commitments, including the ability to make the agreement a formal agreement rather than soft law, provide for mandatory dispute resolution procedures, and establish monitoring mechanisms. How does international law deal with the problems of large-scale cooperation that countries in the world are facing now and will continue to face in the future? Friedmann argues that international law is moving, and must move, from the law of international coexistence, which governs diplomacy between states, to the law of international cooperation. At the same time, international contract law theorists have not shown much interest in reaching out to legal philosophers for enlightenment. Given these issues, this article aims to examine international law as a viable field of study for philosophy of law in the context of legal pluralism and also to understand the ramifications of its development for the international order. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss international treaty arrangements from the perspective of legal philosophy. This study discusses the direction of drafting contracts whose elements must be fulfilled from a legal, philosophical point of view. One way that could be used is to adopt Dworkin's strategy and incorporate the concept of law into moral arguments, this aligns with the distinction between analytical and normative jurisprudence on domestic law and the way many moral philosophers engage with questions of moral justification. The discussion of the problem in this paper uses normative juridical research methods using a descriptive research approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Buchanan, (2007). Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law.

Alvarez, (2002). ‘The New Treaty Makers’, 25 Bc Int’l & Comp L Rev 213.

Besson, Samantha; (2010). Tasioulas, John.Introduction. In: ______ (Ed.). The Philosophy Of International Law.New York: Oxford University.

Buchanan and Keohane, (2006). ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, 20 Ethics and International Affairs.

Buchanan, Allen; Golove David. (2002). Philosophy Of International Law. In: Coleman, Jules L.; Himma, Kenneth Einar; Shapiro, Scott J. The Oxford Handbook Of Jurisprudence And Philosophy Of Law. Oxford: Oxford Uni- Versity,.

Dumbaud, Edward. The Place Of Philosophy In In- Ternational Law. University Of Pennsylvania Law Review, Phi- Ladelphia,

Dworking, Ronald. (2013). A New Philosophy For Interna- Tional Law. Philosophy And Public Affairs, V.41, N.1, P.2-30, Ternational Law.Whether Due To State Interests, Whether

Winter.

International Covenant On Economic, Social And Cultural Rights (Icescr), Art. 9(5) (‘Anyone Who Has Been The Victim Of Unlawful Arrest Or Detention Shall Have An Enforceable Right To Compensation.’).

J. Alvarez, (2005). International Organizations as Law-Makers.

Joel P. Trachtman, (2008). The Economic Structure Of International Law [Hereinafter Economic Structure].

Joel P. Trachtman, (2013). The Future Of International Law: Global Government [Hereinafter Future Of International Law].

L. Henkin, How Nations Behave (1979), At 46–48; Chayes And Chayes, ‘On Compliance’, 47 Int Org (1993) 175, At 176; T. M. Franck, Fairness In International Law And Institutions ( ; Koh, Supra Note 10; Raustiala And Slaughter, Supra Note 34; Keohane, Supra Note 34, At 25.

Matthias Risse, (2012). On Global Justice.

Schacter, (1977). ‘The Twilight Existence Of Nonbinding International Agreements’, 71 Am J Int’l L 296, At 304 (‘Non-Binding Agreements May Be Attainable When Binding Treaties Are Not’).

Tasioulas, (2007). ‘Customary International Law And The Quest For Global Justice’, In A. Perreau- Saussine And J.B. Murphy (Eds), The Nature Of Customary Law: Philosophical, Historical And Legal Perspectives 307.

T.M. Scanlon, (1992). The Aims And Authority Of Moral Theory, 12 Oxford J. Legal Stud. 1.

Teitel, Ruti G. (2011). Humanity ́s Law. New York: Oxford University, 2011.

Tesson, Fernando R. (2010). Philosophy Of International Law. In: May, Larry; Brown, Jeff (Ed.). Philosophy Of Law: Classic And Contemporary Readings. Chichester: Wi- Ley-Blackwell, P. 187-199.

Trachtman, Future Of International Law, Supra Note 1, At 1.

Trachtman, (2006). Economic Structure, Supra Note 14, At Ix–Xi, And Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (2008), With Jack L. Goldsmith & Eric A. Posner, The Limits Of International Law.

Wolfgang Friedmann, (1964). The Changing Structure Of International Law I

Kinesti, Rakanita Dyah Ayu. 2021. “Penerapan Nilai Karakter Kedisiplinan Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Di SD Al-Ma’soem.” Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan 01(04):286–92.

LUBIS, MUTIARA RAMADANI. 2020. “STRATEGI KEPALA MADRASAH DALAM MENINGKATKAN BUDAYA DISIPLIN PESERTA DIDIK DI YAYASAN MTS ISLAMIYAH MEDAN SKRIPSI.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Zefanya, A. (2022). Implikasi Filsafat Hukum dalam Melakukan Kebijakan dalam Pembuatan dan Perancangan Kontrak Internasional. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(4), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v1i4.1213