Model Pelestarian Berbasis Masyarakat terhadap Rumah Adat Osing sebagai Living Heritage: Resistensi terhadap Paradoks Pariwisata Budaya

Penulis

  • Budiani Budiani Politeknik Negeri Banyuwangi
  • Ahmadintya Anggit Hanggraito Politeknik Negeri Banyuwangi
  • Bitsyi Naviri Ismaniar Politeknik Negeri Banyuwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/toba.v5i3.8951

Kata Kunci:

living heritage, Osing traditional house, cultural tourism, Community-Based Tourism, Authenticity

Abstrak

The increasing demand for authentic cultural tourism has created a paradox in which tourism development may threaten cultural authenticity while the absence of economic value may lead to the abandonment of cultural heritage. This study aims to analyze the Osing community model in maintaining traditional houses as living heritage as a form of resistance to the paradox of cultural tourism in Kemiren Village, Banyuwangi, Indonesia. The research employed a qualitative case study with an ethnographic approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, documentation, and field notes involving customary leaders, traditional house owners, tourism managers, community leaders, and visitors. Data analysis followed Spradley's ethnographic procedures, including domain, taxonomic, componential, and cultural theme analyses. The findings reveal that the sustainability of Osing traditional houses is supported by four interconnected elements: maintaining their residential function, preserving customary rituals, ensuring community-based management, and strengthening local economic benefits through tourism. These elements position traditional houses not merely as cultural artifacts but as living heritage embedded in everyday life. The study concludes that the Osing community has developed a community-based resistance model capable of maintaining cultural authenticity while ensuring economic sustainability, thereby addressing the paradox between cultural commodification and heritage abandonment in cultural tourism

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Ardhyanto, A., Dewancker, B., & Heryana, R. E. (2023). Recollecting Manggarai Vernacular Architecture as Told by the Locals of Labuan Bajo. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Indonesian Architecture and Planning (ICIAP 2022), Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 334, Iciap, 11–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1403-6_2

Astra. (2025). Desa Sejahtera Astra Kemiren Binaan PT Astra International Tbk Menjaga Budaya Osing, Untuk Menggerakkan Kesejahteraan Desa. https://www.astra.co.id/en/press-release/desa-sejahtera-astra-kemiren-menjaga-budaya-osing-untuk-menggerakkan-kesejahteraan-desa?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Azizi, A. F. (2024). Whose Authenticity? Exploring Host–Guest Interactions in Cultural Tourism Experiences in Indonesia. Advances in Tourism Studies, 2(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.53893/ats.v2i2.59

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Budiasa, I. M. (2016). Paradigma dan Teori dalam Etnografi Baru dan Etnografi Kritis. Seminar Nasional Paradigma Dan Teori-Teori Komunikasi Dalam Ilmu Komunikasi, 9–24.

Butler, R. W. (1999). Sustainable tourism: A state‐of‐the‐art review. Tourism Geographies, 1(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616689908721291

Cayarini, F. D., Titisari, E. Y., & Wikantiyoso, R. (2022). The Sustainability Concept of Osing Traditional House in Kemiren Banyuwangi. Local Wisdom : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Kearifan Lokal, 14(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.26905/lw.v14i2.6850

Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(88)90028-X

Cole, S. (2007). Beyond authenticity and commodification. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(4), 943–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2007.05.004

Dosinaeng, W. B. N., Lakapu, M., Jagom, Y. O., & Uskono, I. V. (2020). Etnomatematika pada lopo suku boti dan integrasinya dalam pembelajaran matematika. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 5(April), 117–132.

Humaira, S. D., Rahmati, U., Nurdin, A., Amiruddin, & Haikal, M. (2024). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Melalui Pengembangan Desa Wisata Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ketahanan Sosial Budaya Wilayah (Studi Di Desa Wisata Penglipuran Bali). Public Health Journal, 1(2), 17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62710/en63d625

Kusuma, T. A. B. N. S., & Damai, A. H. (2020). Rumah Tradisional Jawa Dalam Tinjauan Kosmologi, Estetika, Dan Simbolisme Budaya [the Javanese Traditional House in Review of Cosmology, Aesthetic, and Cultural Symbolism]. Kindai Etam : Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi, 6(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.24832/ke.v6i1.58

Lake, R. C., & Jeraman, P. (2023). Structuralism perspective to interpret the patterns and meanings found in vernacular architecture. Local Wisdom : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Kearifan Lokal, 15(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.26905/lw.v15i2.10156

Lambert-Pennington, K., & Pappalardo, G. (2025). Exploring the cohesive and social potential of a territorial ecomuseum in eastern sicily. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 31(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2024.2417064

MacCannell, D. (1999). The tourist: a new theory of the leisure class. University of California Press.

Mashuri. (2010). Perwujudan Konsep dan Nilai-Nilai Kosmologi. Ruang, 2(1), 5.

Pappalardo, G. (2020). Community-based processes for revitalizing heritage: Questioning justice in the experimental practice of ecomuseums. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219270

Poulios, I. (2014). The past in the present: A living heritage approach - Meteora, Greece. In The past in the present: A living heritage approach - Meteora, Greece. https://doi.org/10.5334/bak

Putri, S. P. S., & Purwantiasning, A. W. (2021). Kajian Konsep Arsitektur Modular Pada Rumah Susun Itb Jatinangor. Nature: National Academic Journal of Architecture, 8(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.24252/nature.v8i1a9

Rahim, M., Munir, A., Marasabessy, F., & Darmawijaya. (2023). Local Wisdom and Sustainable Features of Tidore Vernacular Architecture. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 11(2), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2023.110201

Rapoport, A. (1969). House Form and Culture (P. L. Wagner (ed.)). Prentice-Hall.

Riany, M., Rachmadi, Y., Sambira, I. Y., Muharam, A. T., & Taufik, R. M. (2014). Kajian Aspek Kosmologi-Simbolisme pada Arsitektur Rumah Tinggal Vernakular di Kampung Naga. Jurnal Reka Karsa, 2(4), 1–12.

Siddiq, M., & Salama, H. (2019). Etnografi Sebagai Sebuah metode dan Teori. KORDINAT, 18(1), 23–48.

Spradley, J. P. (1997). Metode Etnografi (M. Y. Elisabeth (ed.)). PT Tiara Wacana Yogya.

Spradley, J. P. (2007). Metode etnografi (M. Yahya (ed.); II). Tiara Wacana.

Teegavarapu, S., Summers, J. D., & Mocko, G. M. (2008). Case study method for design research: A justification. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 4(January), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2008-49980

UN Tourism. (2025). UN Tourism Announces Best Tourism Villages 2025: 52 Communities Leading Tourism for Rural Development. https://tourism-villages.unwto.org/en/news/un-tourism-announces-best-tourism-villages-2025-52-communities-leading-tourism-for-rural-development/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Wall, G. (1997). Is ecotourism sustainable? Environmental Management, 21(4), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900044

Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. The Political Nature of Cultural Heritage and Tourism: Critical Essays, Volume Three, 26(2), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237749-27

Windiani, & Rahmawati, F. N. (2016). Menggunakan metode etnografi dalam penelitian sosial. Dimensi, 9(2), 87–92.

Diterbitkan

2026-08-07

Cara Mengutip

Budiani, B., Ahmadintya Anggit Hanggraito, & Bitsyi Naviri Ismaniar. (2026). Model Pelestarian Berbasis Masyarakat terhadap Rumah Adat Osing sebagai Living Heritage: Resistensi terhadap Paradoks Pariwisata Budaya. TOBA: Journal of Tourism, Hospitality, and Destination, 5(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.55123/toba.v5i3.8951

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles