OTORITAS DOSEN DAN HABITUS KEPATUHAN MAHASISWA: KAJIAN TENTANG KEKERASAN SIMBOLIK DALAM RUANG AKADEMIK DI UNIVERSITAS PALANGKA RAYA

Authors

  • Fry Steven Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Ririn Ririn Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Hamudi Yusuf Ferlianto Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Cica Universitas Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/sabana.v5i2.8456

Keywords:

Lecturers’ Authority, Habitus of Obedience, Symbolic Violence, Academic Field, Pierre Bourdieu

Abstract

Lecturers’ authority within academic spaces functions not only as a means of knowledge transmission but also as a mechanism for shaping students’ habitus of obedience through subtle symbolic practices. Higher education institutions serve as social fields where relations of domination are reproduced through academic legitimacy, evaluation systems, and hierarchical campus culture. This study employs a qualitative case study approach conducted at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Palangka Raya. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, and were analyzed using Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus, capital, field, and symbolic violence. The findings reveal that lecturers’ symbolic domination encourages students to develop adaptive strategies in the form of obedience, behavioral adjustment, and the restriction of critical expression. This habitus of obedience is produced through a continuous process of educational socialization, causing academic domination to be perceived as natural and legitimate. These findings affirm that academic spaces function not only as sites of knowledge production but also as arenas for reproducing power structures through symbolic mechanisms that often remain unnoticed by the actors involved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. Mohammed, “Sociology of symbolic violence and its relationship to school ideology according to Pierre Bourdieu,” International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 40–49, 2024, doi: 10.48047/intjecse/v16i2.5.

[2] G. A. Siswadi, “Reproduksi kekuasaan melalui kekerasan simbolik dalam sistem pendidikan: Analisis kritis pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu,” Widya Aksara: Jurnal Agama Hindu, vol. 29, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.54714/widyaaksara.v29i1.255.

[3] G. Evalinda, “Symbolic violence in English textbooks,” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Amsir, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://journal.stieamsir.ac.id/index.php/abrj/article/view/291

[4] R. Mohulaingo, S. Pomalingo, S. Halidu, and C. Cuga, “Mengurai kekerasan simbolik di balik seragam sekolah,” SINERGI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1474–1487, 2025, doi: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i3.1032.

[5] A. Alfian, “Kekerasan simbolik dalam wacana keagamaan di Indonesia,” Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama, vol. 18, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.24042/al-adyan.v18i1.12628.

[6] N. I. Fatmawati and A. Sholikin, “Pierre Bourdieu dan konsep dasar kekerasan simbolik,” Madani Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 41–60, 2020, doi: 10.52166/madani.v12i1.1899.

[7] P. Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, 1977.

[8] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Sage Publications, 2021.

[9] R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. Sage Publications, 2021.

[10] M. Meka, “Observational methods in qualitative research: Practices and challenges,” Jurnal Penelitian Sosial, vol. 5, no. 2, 2023.

[11] D. Daruhadi and S. Sopiati, “Teknik wawancara dalam penelitian kualitatif,” Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, vol. 6, no. 1, 2024.

[12] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications, 2020.

[13] L. S. Nowell, J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules, “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 20, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.1177/16094069211042738.

[14] E. Wihardjo, I. Pranawukir, A. A. Yusuff, M. F. S. Setiawan, and Fardhoni, “Konsep pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu dan relevansinya terhadap pengembangan budaya akademik di perguruan tinggi,” INCARE: International Journal of Educational Resources, vol. 5, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.59689/incare.v5i4.1073.

[15] B. Kloot, “The reproduction of inequality in higher education: A Bourdieusian analysis,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 463–478, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1722628.

[16] P. Bourdieu, “The Forms of Capital BT - Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education,” Greenwood Press, 1986.

[17] F. A. Fudiyartanto and G. Sathl, “Theorizing the professional habitus: Operationalizing Bourdieu to explore the role of pedigree in Indonesian higher education.,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., pp. 157–172, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-07

How to Cite

Fry Steven, Ririn, R., Hamudi Yusuf Ferlianto, & Cica. (2026). OTORITAS DOSEN DAN HABITUS KEPATUHAN MAHASISWA: KAJIAN TENTANG KEKERASAN SIMBOLIK DALAM RUANG AKADEMIK DI UNIVERSITAS PALANGKA RAYA. SABANA: Jurnal Sosiologi, Antropologi, Dan Budaya Nusantara, 5(2), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.55123/sabana.v5i2.8456