DIALEKTIKA TRADISI DAN MODERNITAS: STUDI FENOMENOLOGI WEDANGAN MASA KINI DI SURAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55123/sabana.v5i2.8084Keywords:
Wedangan, Tradition and Modernity, Multiple Modernities, Class Distinction, PhenomenologyAbstract
This study aims to analyse the dialectic between tradition and modernity in the transformation of wedangan in the city of Surakarta. Historically, wedangan served as an egalitarian culinary space and a source of social cohesion based on subsistence strategies. However, in the contemporary urban context, wedangan has undergone a reconstruction of meaning with the emergence of modern wedangan. This study explores the cultural strategies employed by wedangan owners in reinterpreting tradition, as well as understanding visitors’ perceptions of today’s wedangan. This study employs Alfred Schutz’s phenomenological qualitative approach, supported by netnographic data and field observations conducted at three wedangan locations in Surakarta, namely Wedangan Pendhopo, Wedangan Sakeca and Wedangan Oemah Joglo as well as in-depth interviews. The results of this study indicate that contemporary wedangan are hybrid entities that reconstruct Javanese cultural symbols as an adaptation strategy within the framework of multiple modernities, whilst simultaneously serving as an arena for class distinction through the commodification of nostalgia. This transformation has led to the fading of the wedangan’s function as an egalitarian public space and the strengthening of individualistic consumption patterns among the urban middle class. These findings contribute to a sociological understanding of the negotiation of local culinary traditions within the currents of urban modernity.
Downloads
References
[1] Pierre. Bourdieu, Distinction : a social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press, 2000.
[2] C. Fischler, “Food, self and identity,” Social Science Information, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 275–292, 1988, doi: 10.1177/053901888027002005.
[3] S. N. . Eisenstadt, Multiple modernities. Routledge, 2017.
[4] A. Affandi and Sudarmadi, “Kajian Usaha Hidangan Istimewa Kampung di Kabupaten Boyolali,” Riset Manajemen Dan Akuntansi Volume, vol. 10 No 2, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.36600/rma.v10i2.98.
[5] W. Aribowo, P. A. W. Wibowo, W. A. Rais, and S. Ediyono, “Wedangan: An ethnomethodological perspective of the liberating food marriage,” Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, vol. 8, no. 11, 2024, doi: 10.24294/jipd.v8i11.8275.
[6] O. Hadi Nurcahyono, “Mekanisme Bertahan Hidup Pedagang Angkringan di Era Disrupsi,” Habitus, vol. 3, pp. 41–50, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/habitus.v3i1.32214.
[7] Rahadhini and Lamidi, “The Difference Analysis Of Traditional And Modern Wedangan Views Of The Quality Of Service And Customer Satisfaction (Survey Of Consumer Wedangan Amir And Wedangan Lawang Djoenjing),” Research Fair Unisri, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–90, Mar. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.33061/rsfu.v1i1.1548.
[8] B. Yudhistira, T. N. Haryani, and O. H. Nurcahyono, “Angkringan Development as a Traditional Culinary Identity,” in Enhancing Small Medium Enterprise Competitiveness Based on Creative Economy in Innovation Disruptions, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNS, 2018, pp. 38–43.
[9] D. R. Kusumastuti and K. A. Surya, “Angkringan Sebagai Ruang Publik Dan Sarana Interaksi Sosial Di Kota Bogor,” Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 91–105, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.32509/pustakom.v5i1.1850.
[10] E. Wiratno, R. Fahirah, and M. A. Dalimunthe, “Fenomena Maraknya Kopi Angkringan di Era Milenial Sekarang,” Journal El-Mal, vol. 5, no. 3, 2024, doi: DOI:1047467/elmal.v5i3.4849.
[11] D. Hari, W. Nurzamni, and A. Marlina, “Identifikasi Pola Perilaku Pada Ruang Komunal Angkringan,” Region, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v14i1.22164.
[12] A. H. Sancoko and V. Rahmawati, “Membangun Strategi Pemasaran Umkm Kuliner Kajian Fenomenologi Angkringan Di Surabaya,” Jurnal Keuangan dan Bisnis, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 96, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.32524/jkb.v17i2.579.
[13] J. W. . Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications, 2013.
[14] Muhammad. Farid and Mohammad. Adib, Fenomenologi dalam penelitian ilmu sosial. Kencana, 2018.
[15] R. V. Kozinets, “Netnography,” in The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, Wiley, 2015, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067.
[16] M. B. . Miles and A. M. . Huberman, Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Ikhwal Sukirman, Imri Yonaldi Tefa, Salwa fadilla Khailifa, Reza Zain Ananta Sukirman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
